🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's presidential campaign, the former president wooed voters with promises to reduce prices starting on day one. But, after his inauguration, he seemed to pay minimal attention to affordability issues. All that changed after inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Within days, the Trump administration initiated a slapdash effort to tackle affordability. Unfortunately, the drive has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with absurdity, inconsistencies, magical thinking, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Detached Claims and Grocery Store Reality

Just two days post-election, the president began his affordability drive with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” These words from billionaire Trump—who frequently mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens who struggle when visiting the grocery store. Essentially, he ignored their struggles as trivial, implying they had it wrong about actual costs.

This statement about declining prices proved absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. In what way could every price be falling when his cherished tariffs were increasing costs? Official statistics show the cost of bananas increased nearly 7% over the past year, the price of beef went up almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped 18.9%—partly because of import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, costs increased in five of the six main grocery groups tracked by the Consumer Price Index, such as meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Claims

In spite of these numbers, the president persists in repeating his misleading narrative about affordability. After the vote, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements ignore the fact that prices overall have unarguably risen after the previous administration. Currently, price growth is running at a 3% annual rate, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, he boasted that gas prices had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, even though government figures show they average over three dollars.

Faced with actual conditions and lower approval ratings, advisers apparently cautioned that his “prices are down” message made him sound disconnected from ordinary people. Many voters are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following assurances of reductions. In response, advisers suggested one quick fix: reduce certain import taxes. The logical move clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs would not increase costs for American shoppers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Effects

With some tariffs being rolled back on several food items, Trump will probably claim that he has lowered costs once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be similar to a firestarter taking credit for extinguishing a fire that he had started. In another instance, while speaking fast-food leaders, Trump stated that “this is the peak period of America” and assured the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a wealthy individual to make, but they ring hollow to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when millions risk losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

According to a survey conducted last fall, 74% of Americans think the state of the economy are fair or poor, while only 26% consider them good or excellent. Another poll found that 61% of Americans feel the administration’s actions have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Reality and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, Trump’s top economic official, lately disputed claims of a prosperous era. He stated that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the US economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and shed approximately tens of thousands of positions since January. Citing this weakness, Bessent urged the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could ease financial pressure.

In response to widespread concern about living costs, the president proposed a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” For many struggling Americans, it seems like manna from heaven, but the prospects are dim that Congress—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will enact the proposal. This idea could increase federal spending, increase interest rates, and possibly drive prices higher by putting more money into the economy.

A further supposed fix for affordability involved introducing 50-year mortgages, with the notion that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that 50-year mortgages have minimal impact to lower monthly payments—often reducing them by just $100 or $200 per month. The drawback is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost homeowners pay and slow building home value.

Blaming the Past Government and Financial Prospects

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more pointed fingers at Biden for financial challenges, including increasing costs. Officials stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are unfounded and inaccurate claims. In reality, Biden handed over a strong economy, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. However, the current administration’s actions—especially his tariffs—have created an difficult situation, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, 22 states are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. He fears that if large states like major economies tumble into recession, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. During recessions, consumers typically have less money to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, given Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign likely to do little to control costs, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that struggling Americans really can’t afford.