🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and revealed fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume talks with the US government. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Path

Araghchi is navigating a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president asserting the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations employed their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Situation

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if talks resume.

Trump in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his address to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by military means. He said the strikes began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to dictate their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and stays the final answer to address disagreements, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this attack."